| Home |
| Writing Services |
| The Martialist |
| Fiction |
| Non-Fiction |
| Editorials |
| Humor |
| Philosophy |
| Published Work |
| Links |
| Contact |
"Always grab the reader by the throat in the first paragraph,
sink your thumbs into his windpipe in the second, and hold him against the wall
until the tag line."
- Paul O'Neil
All Original Site Content
Copyright © 2003-2004
Phil Elmore, all rights reserved.
In my article, Why I Am Not A Libertarian, I said this:
I do not advocate empowering the State to micromanage the lives of free people. However, I do advocate the promotion of positive ethics through active persuasion. Logic, reason, rhetoric, persistence, even volume: these are the tools of persuasion, and we must use them.
I received an e-mail from a friend asking me about this passage. He asked me
several good questions. Whom did I want to do this persuading? Through what
means would it be done? More importantly, what did I mean by "volume?"
Wouldn't using "volume" be using force to impose my will on others?
In advocating active persuasion to spread rational ethics, I envision a world in
which interested people speak out about those ideas, principles, and
issues that are important. Every rational person who concurs with the ethics I
advocate, including those I can convince through reason to agree with me, are
among those I would hope to see persuading others. As for what means they're
going to use, every avenue in which people communicate freely with one another
is a battleground on which to fight the war of ideas. The Web and discussion
forums are great examples, but each of us, in our personal lives, has many
opportunities to speak to people. There are those with whom we chat casually,
and there are others we encounter in friendly settings. I see no reason not to
share what we believe, provided we do not behave boorishly.
My reference to volume, which troubled my friend, is just a nod to the fact that
debates sometimes become heated. When you debate someone, you must be prepared
to match volume for volume. There will always be those who attempt to shout you
down -- literally or, on the Web, figuratively -- to drown out your voice. You,
in turn, must be prepared to shout back for the benefit of those who might be
listening and learning. This is not force, but persuasion, provided
you're not screaming at people who've told you they do not wish to converse with
you at all. There's a distinct difference between harassing someone and
being prepared to make yourself heard in the course of an argument.
The tools of persuasion, as I've described them, meet certain needs:
The only options to resolve human conflict are reason and force, persuasion
or coercion. To effectively persuade is indeed to use the force of your will to
create change in achieving what you desire. The critical difference between
persuasion and force, however, is that you are not imposing your will
when you change another's mind. Rather, you are making your will manifest
through the power of reason.
Change a person's mind, and you make them your intellectual ally. They join you
in the pursuit of worthy goals. Those you persuade, therefore, are not your victims,
but your fellow victors.